Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. United States Steel Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
878 F.2d 686 · 1989
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2015
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 49 U.S.C. § 10707 · 49 U.S.C. § 11705 · 49 U.S.C. § 11706 · 49 U.S.C. § 11902
Relies on California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · Barrett v. United States · ITT Continental Baking Co. v. William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. · Arkadelphia Milling Co v. St Louis Southwestern Ry Co Hasty · William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. ITT Continental Baking Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where, as here, the original pleading placed the defendant on notice that the disputed conduct was of a continuing nature, the defendant is generally expected to defend against all claims arising out of that course of conduct — whether accruing before or after the original pleading was filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Waiver of prejudgment interest would confer on those who delay payment of the balance due an advantage over shippers who meet their obligations promptly. In effect undercharges would afford a delinquent shipper an interest-free loan from the carrier.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“To allow the [carrier] to recover without awarding prejudgment interest would be to diminish the tariff charge by an amount representing the value of the use of the money owed for the period prior to judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.