Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 878 F.2d 871 - Brown v. Glossip

Brown v. Glossip’s Empirical Analysis

878 F.2d 871 · 1989

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
4
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Snyder v. Trepagnier (1998), McDonald ex rel. McDonald v. Haskins (1992)

28 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

36019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Elliott v. Perez · Shillingford v. Holmes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “facts which, if proved, would defeat [the] claim of immunity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'evidence that the officer harbored ill-will toward the citizen'[,] ... whether a warrant was employed, whether the plaintiff resisted arrest or was armed, whether more than one arrestee or officer was involved, whether the plaintiff was sober, whether other dangerous or exigent circumstances existed at the time of arrest, and on what charges plaintiff was arrested”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The purpose of requiring such allegations is, of course, to permit the trial court, and our court on review, if necessary, to implement a qualified immunity defense 'at the earliest possible stage of litigation.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.