Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 878 F.2d 925 - United States v. Arnold

United States v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis

878 F.2d 925 · 1989

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
March 2006
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently March 2006 · most notably General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Jones (1993), First Union Mortgage Corp. v. Eubanks (In Re Eubanks) (1998)

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

590198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 1222 · 11 U.S.C. § 1225 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 28 U.S.C. § 158

Relies on United States 77-1359 v. Kimbell Foods Inc · Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. Whitman · Riggsby Suburban Bank of Cary Grove v. W Riggsby · Colegrove Cardinal Federal Savings Loan Association v. E Colegrove

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[v]alue as of the effective date of the plan ... indicates that the promised payment under the plan must be discounted to present value as of the effective date of the plan. The discounting should be based only on the unpaid balance of the amount due under the plan, until that amount, including interest, is paid in full.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The creditor in Colegrove was completely secured and was not required to accept unsecured status as to any portion of its debt. In Memphis Bank, however, the creditor was forced by operation of law to write-down the current value of the loan, thus ... creating a new loan to which creditor was entitled to interest at the current market rate, even if the current market exceeded the contract rate.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “there are no factual determinations relevant to the issues to be made by the bankruptcy court upon the district court's remand”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.