Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 878 F.2d 976 - 72950 Powelson More

72950 Powelson More’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
February 2005
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2005 · most notably 23 721 73581 Pruitt Landmark Savings Association, In the Matter of Forty-Eight Insulations Incorporated Appeal of Maritime Asbestos (1997)

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

220198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers · Will v. United States · Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The timing of the court’s withdrawal of the reference here, even if not improper, seems to be in conflict with the statutory objectives of utilizing the expertise of bankruptcy judges, reducing forum shopping and preserving the appellate processes provided by the Bankruptcy Act.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “derailed the [bankruptcy] process provided by statute.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] decision to withdraw a reference or to refuse such a withdrawal is interlocutory and non-reviewable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.