Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 878 F.3d 498 - United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

878 F.3d 498 · 2017

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
January 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 875 · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Puckett v. United States · United States of America v. Javier Ceballos-Torres · United States v. Delgado · United States v. Mackey · United States v. Yanez Sosa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court then has discretion to correct the error if (4) it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “clear or obvious, rather than subject to reasonable dispute”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “affected the appellant's substantial rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.