878 F. Supp. 2d 101 - Haselwander v. McHugh’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. The applicant contends that- he should be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result of enemy action. 2. The letters of support submitted with this request for reconsideration clearly state that the applicant was wounded in action. 3. The photographs that reportedly show the applicant’s wounds bandaged are insufficient by themselves as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. There is 'no available medical record to corroborate the photographs. 4. Unfortunately the available evidence is not sufficiently substantiating to show that the applicant was wounded as the result of hostile action, that he received medical treatment for any such wound, and that such medical treatment was made a matter of official record. 5. In view of the above, the applicant’s request should be denied.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.