Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 878 P.2d 1161 - Doe v. Doe

Doe v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Delli Paoli v. United States · Higgins v. Salt Lake County · Winegar v. Froerer Corp. · Ferree v. State · Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An individual's acts can simultaneously give rise to a claim for negligence and a claim for an intentional tort. The two doctrines are not necessarily mutually exclusive, but rather may overlap and coexist on a continuum.... A finding of gross negligence does not preclude a finding of intent and a finding of willful misconduct does not preclude elements of negligence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.