Lyden v. Winer’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
March 2000
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Clarke v. Beckwith · United States v. Annabi · 52 Cal. 2d 715 - Burks v. Blackman · 98 Ill. App. 3d 570 - Kuhn v. General Parking Corp. · Eiselein v. K-Mart, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Lyden, 878 P.2d at 520 , we held: Likewise, whether landlord’s control of the premises may be inferred from the facts present in this case is a question for the trier of fact. * * * We thus reverse and remand for a determination by the trier of fact. As noted earlier, if the trier of fact determines that appellee landlord retained control of the rented premises, or the portion in question, then appellee owes the same duty of care to both the tenant and her social guest. * * * Landlord owes a duty, to his tenant and any person on the premises by right of the tenant, to exercise reasonable care in maintaining those areas of the rented premises over which he retains control. Whether appellee landlord retained control over any area of the premises is a question of fact, and, in this case, a genuine question of fact does exist. We reverse the decision of the district court and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]here the owner of the premises leases parts thereof to different tenants, and expressly or impliedly reserves other parts thereof, such as entrances, halls, stairways, porches, walks, etc., for the common use of different tenants, it is his duty to exercise reasonable care to keep safe such parts of which he so reserves control, and if he is negligent in this regard, and a personal injury results by reason thereof to a tenant or to a person there in the right of the tenant, he is liable, provided that the injury occurs while such part of the premises is being used in the manner intended.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roberts v. Klinkosh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.