Holland v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Ring v. Arizona · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State is correct in its assertion that a defendant is not entitled to formal notice of the aggravating circumstances to be employed by the prosecution and that an indictment for capital murder puts a defendant on sufficient notice that the statutory aggravating factors will be used against him.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.