878 So. 2d 1044 - PERS v. Kellum’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 774 So. 2d 421 - PERC v. Marquez · 743 So. 2d 973 - MS DEPT. OF HEALTH v. Natchez Community Hosp. · 797 So. 2d 888 - PUBLIC EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. Dishmon · 846 So. 2d 1014 - PERS v. Dearman · PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For the purposes of disability determination, the medical board shall apply the following definition of disability: the inability to perform the usual duties of employment or the incapacity to perform such lesser duties, if any, as the employer, in its discretion, may assign without material reduction in compensation, or the incapacity to perform the duties of any employment covered by the Public Employees’ Retirement System (Section 25-11-101 et seq.) that is actually offered and is within the same general territorial work area, without material reduction in compensation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“may accept a disability medical determination from the Social Security Administration in lieu of a certification from the medical board.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.