Reece v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Osbourn v. State (2002), Fairow v. State (1997)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 182nd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Harris v. McRae · Moore v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant contends that the testimony reflects appellant’s possession to be as consistent with personal use as with delivery. Even if the record supports conflicting inferences, we must “presume — even if it does not affirmatively appear in the record — that the trier of fact resolved any such conflict in favor of the prosecution, and must defer to that resolution.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rhodes v. State“The terms of Article 38.23 are clearly mandatory, the only issue being whether under the facts of a particular case an issue concerning the validity of the search is raised by the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Madden v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.