Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 878 SW2D 686 - Wall v. State

Wall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Sharp v. State · Sharp v. Texas · Stiggers v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain Appellant’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance because the State failed to prove that the adulterants and/or dilutants were added with the intent to increase quantity. Whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain Appellant’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance because the State failed to prove that the actual weight was greater than 1 gram.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.