Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 879 F.2d 1388 - International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Iron Ship Builders Blacksmiths Forgers Helpers--Local v. Transue & Williams Corp

International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Iron Ship Builders Blacksmiths Forgers Helpers--Local v. Transue & Williams Corp’s Empirical Analysis

879 F.2d 1388 · 1989

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
June 2007
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2007 · most notably Robinson v. Johnson (2002), Luden's Inc v. Local Union No of Bakery Confectionery and Tobacco Workers' International Union of America (1994)

17 federal appellate · 2 district ·

250198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he existence of a labor contract `does not depend on its reduction in writing'; it can be shown by conduct manifesting an intention to abide by agreed-upon terms.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whatever the motives behind the plaintiff's and defendant's pleading strategy, to allow the defendant to raise the bar of the statute of limitations after so long a delay [thirty months] and after so many intervening acts had occurred, would make a mockery of the intent and purpose of the statute of limitations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]t all relevant times [after the expiration of the CBA], the parties refused to marshal economic weapons and adhered to the grievance and arbitration provisions of their contract”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.