Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 879 F.2d 1424 - Cain v. Larson

Cain v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis

879 F.2d 1424 · 1989

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
6
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably Double I Ltd. Partnership v. Plan & Zoning Commission (1991), Giaimo v. City of New Haven (2001)

18 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

30019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Bishop v. Wood · Hewitt v. Helms · Ingraham v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is by now well-established that in order to demonstrate a property interest worthy of protection under the fourteenth amendment's due process clause, a party may not simply rely upon the procedural guarantees of state law or local ordinance.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]n order to give rise to a constitutionally-protected property interest, a statute or ordinance must go beyond mere procedural guarantees to provide some substantive criteria limiting the State's discretion....”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.