Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 879 F.2d 184 - Bodden v. Osgood

Bodden v. Osgood’s Empirical Analysis

879 F.2d 184 · 1989

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Baris v. Sulpicio Lines Inc (1991), Phelps v. McClellan (1994)

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

27019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1333

Relies on Mosley v. Cozby · Huckeby v. Frozen Food Express · Tnt Marine Service Inc v. Weaver Shipyards & Dry Docks Inc Tug Ocean Wind · Moser v. Texas Trailer Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, merely requesting a jury trial does not change an admiralty claim, identified as such, to a non- admiralty claim. In such cases the district court should simply deny the request”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a statement identifying the claim as an admiralty or maritime claim for the purposes of Rules 14(c), 38(e), 82, and the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[U]nless the claim is cognizable only in admiralty, the special practice features for admiralty claims are not applicable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.