Schroeder v. Copley Newspaper’s Empirical Analysis
879 F.2d 266 · 1989
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably Heller Financial, Inc. v. Midwhey Powder Co. (1989), Tolle v. Carroll Touch, Inc. (1992)
25 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 627 (§ 8 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co. · Coastal Steel Corp. v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc. · Hayes v. Lockhart · In re Disbarment of Schaefer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The information [plaintiff] needed to know before filing a charge was straight-forward: that it was unlawful to discriminate on the basis of age, and that he was required to file a charge with the EEOC to pursue a discrimination claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`The efficient operation of the [EEOC] demands such notice' because `Congress certainly did not intend the [EEOC] to squander its resources by investigating where no complaint has been filed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.