LaLonde v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
879 F.2d 665 · 1989
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2002
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 48 U.S.C. § 1424
Relies on Consolidated Data Terminals v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc. · Yegeta v. Baima · Campbell v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University · de Vera v. Blaz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To establish implied consent, the [plaintiff] must demonstrate that [the defendant] understood evidence had been introduced to prove [the new issue], and that [the new issue] had been directly addressed, not merely inferentially raised by incidental evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When issues not raised by the pleadings are tried by express or implied consent of the parties they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.