Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

879 F.2d 863

Docket Nos. 89-6544, 89-7545.

John H. Mudd v. James E. Johnson William P. Rogers, Darnell Jones v. James E. Johnson William P. Rogers

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • John H. MUDDv.James E. JOHNSON; William P. Rogers
  • Darnell JONESv.James E. JOHNSON; William P. Rogers

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 24, 1989. Decided: July 11, 1989.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1989-07-11

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on 14 Fed.r.serv.3d 345

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1989-07-11

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

John H. Mudd, appellant pro se.

Darnell Jones, appellant pro se.

Mark Ralph Davis (Office of the Attorney General of Virginia), for appellees.

Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

John H. Mudd and Darnell Jones appeal from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the records and the district court's opinions disclose that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mudd v. Johnson, C/A No. 88-73-L (W.D.Va. Feb. 16, 1989); Jones v. Johnson, C/A No. 88-77-L (W.D.Va., Feb. 16, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/879/f2d/863 · .json · Public domain