Stimmel v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
879 F.3d 198 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 925
Relies on Buckley v. Valeo · United States v. Salerno · District of Columbia v. Heller · State v. Smith · Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“United States v. Chapman , 666 F.3d 220 , 231 (4th Cir. 2012). However, that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Kanter v. Barr“[W]e have upheld § 922(g)(1), which disarms even non-violent felons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Kanter v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.