Gerstner v. Berryhill’s Empirical Analysis
879 F.3d 257 · 2018
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Craft v. Astrue · Moss v. Astrue · Scott v. Astrue · Campbell v. Astrue · Bauer v. Astrue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The judge also found no clear error in the magistrate judge's recommendation that substantial evidence supported the ALJ's decision that Hardy was not disabled and could perform light work. II. ANALYSIS On appeal, Hardy argues that the ALJ should have given controlling weight to the opinions of his treating physicians, Dr. Bauer and Dr. Dycoco. A treating doctor's opinion generally is entitled to controlling weight if it is consistent with the record, and it cannot be rejected without a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hardy v. Berryhill“An ALJ may not selectively discuss portions of a physician's report that support a finding of non-disability while ignoring other portions that suggest a disability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the affect and mood notes that the ALJ emphasized simply described how [plaintiff] presented on the days of her appointments. They were not general assessments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morris v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.