United States v. Stepanets’s Empirical Analysis
879 F.3d 367 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 21 U.S.C. § 331 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 353 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on Hamling v. United States · Reves v. Ernst & Young · United States v. Peoni · United States v. Sullivan · United States v. Covington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“apprise the defendant of the charged offense,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in context and with common sense -- connote the kind of checking that pharmacists regularly do when filling prescriptions, i.e., confirming that legit prescriptions triggered the drug shipments.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“so that the defendant can prepare a defense and plead double jeopardy in any future prosecution for the same offense,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.