Hassell v. Fischer’s Empirical Analysis
879 F.3d 41 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Malley v. Briggs · Carey v. Piphus · Ashcroft v. al-Kidd · Ashcroft v. al-Kidd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Hassell has made no showing that the conditions of his PRS term were in any respect more onerous than those of conditional release would have been. Without any showing of an adverse consequence during [the relevant period], Hassell has not suffered a denial of his due process rights during that period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reyes v. Fischer“who were sentenced to prison in New York State for a fixed term that did not include a term of PRS, but who were nevertheless subjected to PRS after the maximum expiration dates of their determinate sentences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reyes v. Fischer“That the defendants [Fischer, Annucci, and Tracy] eventually took reasonable steps to comply with Earley I cannot excuse their unreasonable delay in doing so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reyes v. Fischer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.