Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 879 F.3d 61 - In re Flonase Antitrust Litigation

In re Flonase Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

879 F.3d 61 · 2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
July 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1715 (§ 3 of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. · Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “on the litigation act the State takes that creates the waiver.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.