DeBry v. Cascade Enterprises’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably ProMax Development Corp. v. Mattson (1997), Neff v. Neff (2011)
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc. · Pace v. Parrish · Dugan v. Jones · Alta Industries, Ltd. v. Hurst · Mihalchak v. American Dredging Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The appellants] purport to marshal the evidence ... [by referring to] an appendix to their brief which, together with the pages in the brief, exceeds the page limitation allowed by Rule 24(g) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. This does not comply with the requirement to marshal evidence. It is improper for counsel to attempt to enlarge the page limit of the brief by placing critical facts in appendices.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A directed verdict and a judgment n.o.v. are justified only if, after looking at the evidence and all reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party, `the trial court concludes that there is no competent evidence which would support a verdict in his favor.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“we follow one standard of review: We reverse only if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, we conclude that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.