879 So. 2d 112
Decided May 14, 2004
Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2004-05-14
Cited by 176 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 56 So. 3d 170 - Poissenot v. St. Bernard Parish Sheriff's Office (2011), 984 So. 2d 185 - MacFarlane v. SCHNEIDER NAT. BULK CARRIERS (2008)
175 state decisions
Relies on Application of Respondek · 819 So. 2d 1020 - In Re Bourke · In Re Application of Appert
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2004-05-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1concurs.
¶2I concur in the majority’s decision to deny the petition, because my contrary opinion expressed in dissent in In re: Bourke, 02-1468 (La.6/14/02), 819 So.2d 1020, citing to In re: Appert, 444 So.2d 1208 (La.1984), and In re: Application of Respondek, 442 So.2d 435 (La.1983), has not borne fruit, and today’s decision follows the recently decided cases on this issue.