879 So. 2d 692 - Bozeman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 45 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2 Cal. 3d 1 - Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit District · Tipton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co. · Martinez v. Richardson · The Propeller Monticello v. Gilbert Mollison · Acuar v. Letourneau
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a tortfeasor may not benefit, and an injured plaintiff's tort recovery may not be reduced, because of monies received by the plaintiff from sources independent of the tortfeasor's procuration or contribution.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“Medicaid recipients are unable to collect the Medicaid “write-off’ amounts as damages because no consideration is provided for the benefit. Thus, plaintiffs recovery is limited to what was paid by Medicaid. However, in those instances, where plaintiffs patrimony has been diminished in some way in order to obtain the collateral source benefits, then plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of the bargain, and may recover the full value of his medical services, including the “write-off’ amount.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]here the plaintiff pays no enrollment fee, has no wages deducted, and otherwise provides no consideration for the collateral source benefits he receives, we hold that the plaintiff is unable to recover the 'write-off' amount.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.