879 So. 2d 870 - State v. Newman’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Castaneda v. Partida · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the substantial rights of a criminal defendant are not affected per se solely because he is indicted by a grand jury selected pursuant to local laws passed by the Louisiana State Legislature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] judgment or ruling shall not be reversed by an appellate court because of any error, defect, irregularity, or variance which does not affect substantial rights of the accused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the constitutionality of a legal provision only if the provision seriously affects his or her rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.