Dunbar v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 547 So. 2d 613 - State v. Smith · 684 So. 2d 189 - Gaber v. State · 648 So. 2d 274 - Hamrick v. State · State v. Reardon · 662 So. 2d 1016 - Crawford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Robbery requires proof of a taking or depriving of property, an element that battery does not require. In contrast, the crime of battery requires an actual and intentional touching of the victim, which is not necessarily an element of robbery. During a robbery, a robber could place the victim `in fear,' thereby satisfying the force or violence element of robbery, without satisfying the intentional or actual touching element of battery.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. TCE v. State · T.C.E. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.