Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 879 SW2D 167 - Aitch v. State

Aitch v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Carroll v. United States · Chambers v. Maroney · South Dakota v. Opperman · Smith v. Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “suggested the State had presented no evidence proving appellant knew the items were stolen, and that it was impossible for the State to prove that element of the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “prosecutor may refer to an accused's failure to testify in closing argument when such comment is invited by defense counsel's closing argument”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “walk over to [the appellant's] mind, open it up and pull out an intent”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.