Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

88 A.2d 191

Hankerson v. Tillman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 1952-05-01

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1952-05-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1981

5 state decisions

301952196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 The proceedings below consisted of a claim on a promissory note, counterclaim for money due and various motions. This appeal is from the action of the trial ' court in overruling a motion to vacate an order overruling a motion for summary judgment, overruling a motion to dismiss, overruling a motion for production of documents, and ordering plaintiff to file an answer to the counterclaim by a specified date. Obviously these are all interlocutory matters. No final judgment or order has been entered. This court has jurisdiction to hear appeals from interlocutory orders only when such orders change or affect possession of property. Code 1940, Supp. VII, 11-772. The orders complained of are not appealable.

¶2 Appeal dismissed.

/88/a2d/191 · .json · Public domain