Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 A.3d 1053 - Schell v. Guth

Schell v. Guth’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Shiomos v. STATE EMP. RETIREMENT BD. · Fine v. Checcio · Dernovesk v. Commonwealth · Farabaugh v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We understand that [the plaintiff] believes that he was unjustly charged ... He likely shares that feeling with many others ultimately acquitted of criminal charges in a court of law. His acquittal, however, does not necessarily mean that [the law enforcement defendants] should be held civilly liable for their roles in the criminal and internal administrative cases against [him].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.