¶1The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, including its *610evaluation of alleged inconsistencies in testimony. Concur— Mazzarellí, J.E, Friedman, Catterson, Renwick and Richter, JJ.
88 A.D.3d 609
In re Joseph D.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 25, 2011
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2011-10-25
Decided 2011-10-25