Yellow-Stone Kit v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1889
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably State v. Danz (1926), State v. Eames (1936)
1 federal appellate · 45 state decisions — followed in 22 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ehrgott v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y. · Hull v. . Ruggles · Wilkinson v. . Gill · Scraper v. Pipes · Dunn v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The suspicion, even though well founded, that these presents may have been given away in order to induce a larger crowd to assemble at the defendant’s performances, with the expectation that they would buy medicines, or pay a fee for occupying a seat in the tent, would be-too remote to constitute a legal consideration for the tickets.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““A lottery is any scheme where one, on paying money or other valuable thing to another, becomes entitled to receive from him such a return in value, or nothing, as some formula of chance may determine.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hundling
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.