¶1Joe Thompson was indicted for murder in the first degree, committed by killing Miller Brown, and was convicted of that offense; and he appealed.
¶2The defendant testified in his own behalf. He testified, in effect, that at night, while Miller Brown lay upon his bed, after deliberation and premeditation, he shot and killed him. He did so with the intent to kill because Brown threatened to kill him and wanted his wife. There was no evidence that Brown made any effort to -kill him.
¶3Appellant complains that the court refused to instruct the jury as follows:
¶4“If in a trial for murder it has been proved that threats have been made -by deceased against the defendant, and that they -have been oom-municated to the defendant, they may be considered by the jury in making up their verdict to show defendant’s motive.”
¶5Threats could not have mitigated, extenuated or palliated the conduct of the defendant. They could not have reduced the grade of the offense or reduced the punishment; and the court committed no prejudicial error in refusing it.
¶6The appellant asked and the court refused to instruct the jury as to what is necessary to constitute murder in the second degree. There was no evidence tending to prove that appellant was guilty of a decree of offense lower than murder in the first degree; and the court committed no error in so refusing. Jones v. State, 52 Ark. 345; Fagg v. State, 50 Ark. 506; Curtis v. State, 36 Ark. 284.
¶7The evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction.
¶8Judgment affirmed.