Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 ARK 93 - Greer v. Cook

Greer v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
5
states following
April 2002
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2002

21 state decisions

6019081910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pickett v. Ferguson · Baxley v. Laster · Griffith v. Langsdale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The fact that the creditor instituted the suit in a foreign jurisdiction for the sole purpose of vexation and oppression does not authorize the interposition of a court of equity by injunction. The remedy, if any, is at law for the malicious abuse of process.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.