Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 BR 166 - In Re Compton

In Re Compton’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
August 2014
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2014

1 district ·

401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on In Re Anderson · In Re Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In this Court’s experience, Chapter 13 debtors rarely have any reliable guarantee of employment. All that is required for the Court to find that a plan is feasible, where the budget is based upon reasonable, affordable expenses, is that the debtors’ expectations of income are sufficiently realistic that they should be given an opportunity to carry out the plan they propose. It has been stated that: “A debtor proposing a Chapter 13 plan need not prove that the plan is guaranteed to be successful. Virtually every plan that requires some performance in the future will be subject to a risk factor affecting its successful completion. This Court’s judicial discretion is to be exercised, then, to determine at the time of confirmation whether the risk of failure of the proposed plan is impermissible.” In re Anderson, 18 B.R. 763, 765 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 1982), aff'd 28 B.R. 628 (S.D. Ohio 1982).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.