In Re Jablonski’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently January 2002 · most notably Frank and Arlene Wilson v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corporation (1990), Gaglia v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (1989)
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1301 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Napotnik v. Equibank and Parkvale Savings Association · Clark v. First State Bank · In Re Jablonski · Caster v. United States (In Re Caster) · Blakey v. Pierce (In Re Blakey)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) An allowed claim of a creditor secured by a lien on property in which the estate has an interest ... is a secured claim to the extent of the value of such creditor’s interest in the estate’s interest in such property, ... and is an unsecured claim to the extent that the value of such creditor’s interest ... is less than the amount of such allowed claim. Such value shall be determined in light of the purpose of the valuation and of the proposed disposition or use of such property, and in conjunction with any hearing on such disposition or use or on a plan affecting such creditor’s interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Whether a plan impermissibly modifies the rights of the holder of a claim secured only by a mortgage on a debtor’s principal residence must necessarily follow the determination of how much of its claim is, in fact, secured. The context in which these issues usually arise, viz., where a Chapter 13 debtor’s plan is already known, has the unfortunate effect of obscuring the separateness of § 506(a) and § 1322(b)(2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“modify the rights of holders of secured claims, other than a claim secured only by a security interest in real property that is the debtor's principal residence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.