88 Cal. App. 238 - Huling v. Seccombe’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 1968 · most notably 29 Cal. 2d 414 - West v. Evans (1946), 103 Cal. App. 2d 651 - Turner v. Milstein (1951)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Secret Valley Land Co. v. Perry · 59 Cal. App. 464 - Bateman v. Kellogg · Los Angeles & Arizona Land Co. v. Marr · Martin v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. · Estep v. Armstrong
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where findings are irreconcilably in conflict the judgment must be reversed, for the reason that it is impossible, under such circumstances, to determine which findings controlled the court in rendering its judgment. (Los Angeles Land Co. v. Marr, 187 Cal. 126 [ 200 Pac. 1051 ]; Estep v. Armstrong, 91 Cal. 659 [ 27 Pac. 1091 ]; Learned v. Castle, 87 Cal. 454 [ 18 Pac. 872 , 21 Pac. 11 ]; 2 Cal. Jur. 1030, sec. 612.)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.