88 Cal. App. 34 - Tatterson v. Kehrlein’s Empirical Analysis
1927
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently August 2000 · most notably 12 Cal. 2d 501 - Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc. (1939), Pollak v. Staunton (1930)
10 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Southern Development Co of Nevada v. Silva · Hazelton v. Sheckells · Smith v. Bach · Moore v. Copp · Levinson v. Boas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Corporate Securities Act, chapter 532, Statutes 1917, as amended by chapter 148, Statutes 1919, chapters 597 and 658, Statutes 1921, and chapter 50, Statutes 1923, defines in section 2, subdivision 7, the term ‘sale’ as including ‘issue’. Section 3 prohibits ‘sale’ (which includes ‘issue’) without securing a permit from the commissioner of corporations; section 12 makes security issued without a permit void; section 13 makes the ‘issuing^ corporation guilty of a public offense; and section 14 makes the officers, agents, and employees of the corporation guilty of a public offense.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.