People v. Harm R.’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

cited by 20 later decisions

states following

February 1994

most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 1994

18 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 17 Cal. 3d 236 - People v. Olivas · 14 Cal. 3d 557 - Kirkpatrick v. Aline D. · 70 Cal. App. 3d 73 - People v. Sandoval · In Re Ronald S. · 86 Cal. App. 3d 506 - Fishman v. City of Palo Alto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“Section 726 provides that when a minor is removed from the custody of his parents as the result of an order of wardship made pursuant to section 602 (the instant case), a minor may not be held in a physical confinement for longer than the underlying crime and physical confinement expressly includes juvenile hall. Thus, the 145 days in juvenile hall must be credited against the total time the minor may be held within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 25 Cal. 3d 522 - People v. Eric J.
“become embroiled in any controversy between Leonard R. and Eric J. vis-a-vis the application of Penal Code section 2900.5 to the juvenile court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 25 Cal. 3d 522 - People v. Eric J.
“not be held in physical confinement for a period in excess of the maximum term of imprisonment which could be imposed upon an adult convicted”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 25 Cal. 3d 522 - People v. Eric J.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.