88 Cal. App. 3d 873 - Cramer v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
92 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. (1981), 44 Cal. 3d 883 - People v. Williams (1988)
92 state decisions — followed in 18 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Frye v. United States · 11 Cal. 3d 1 - D'AMICO v. Board of Medical Examiners · 17 Cal. 3d 24 - People v. Kelly · Davey v. Southern Pacific Co. · People v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Uniform Act on Blood Tests to Determine Paternity”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A party may not for the first time on appeal present a new theory that `. . . contemplates a factual situation the consequences of which are open to controversy and were not put in issue or presented at the trial. . . .' [Citations.] A new theory may be advanced for the first time on appeal only where it involves `a legal question determinable from facts which are not only uncontroverted in the record but could not be altered by the presentation of additional evidence.' [Citations.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“All relevant evidence is admissible, except as otherwise provided by the Constitution of the United States, The Constitution of the State of Oklahoma, by statute or by this Code. Evidence which is not relevant is not admissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Callison v. Callison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.