Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 CALAPP4TH 808 - Williams v. Williams

Williams v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Marriage of Burgess · 65 Cal. App. 4th 1443 - Estate of Gilkison · In Re Marriage of Whealon · 45 Cal. App. 4th 1732 - Brody v. Kroll · 94 So. 2d 849 - Arons v. Arons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Had the family law court allowed all of the children to either reside in Santa Barbara or move to Utah, we could easily affirm on the deferential standard of appellate review. [Citation.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “compelling circumstances warranting the separation of the siblings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.