Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 Conn. 447 - State v. Peck

State v. Peck’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

155
cited by 155 later decisions
19
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 150 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 155 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & Trantolo (1983), Statewide Grievance Committee v. Rozbicki (1989)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 150 state decisions — followed in 19 states

61019141920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wall · In Re Durant · 7 Mo. App. 556 - Casey v. Steinmeyer · Bar Ass'n v. Greenhood · Fairfield County Bar v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 155 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the court [endeavored to] control[s] the situation and procedure, in its discretion, as the interests of justice may seem to it to require.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is neither a civil action nor a criminal proceeding, but is a proceeding sui generis, the object of which is not the punishment of the offender, but the protection of the court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “courts are, as they should be, left free to act as may in each case seem best in this matter of most important concern to them and to the administration of justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.