88 Conn. App. 506 - Izard v. Izard’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2 Conn. App. 416 - Ehrenkranz v. Ehrenkranz · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Napert-Boyer Partnership · Claros v. Worcester Company · Frillici v. Town of Westport · Casey v. Casey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may take judicial notice without a request of a party to do so. Parties are entitled to receive notice and have an opportunity to be heard for matters susceptible of explanation or contradiction, but not for matters of established fact, the accuracy of which cannot be questioned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“those which help determine the content of law and policy, and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.