Allison v. Corson’s Empirical Analysis
88 F. 581 · 1898
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1933
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cromwell v. County of Sac · Hefner v. Northwestern Mut Life Ins Co · Blount v. Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme Pasteur · Board of Com'rs v. Platt · Mendenhall v. Hall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A preliminary injunction, maintaining tlio status quo, may properly Issue whenever the questions of law or fact to be ultimately determined in a suit are grave and difficult, and injury to the moving party will be immediate', certain, and great if it is denied, while the loss or inconvenience to the opposing party will be comparatively small and insignificant if it is granted.” Allison v. Corson, 88 Fed. 581 , 32 C. C. A. 12 ; City of Newton v. Levis, 79 Fed. 713 , 25 C. C. A. 161 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““A preliminary injunction may properly issue whenever the questions of law or fact to be ultimately determined are grave and difficult, and the injury to the moving party will be immediate and certain and great if denied, while the loss or inconvenience to the opposing party will be comparatively small and insignificant if it is granted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.