Vogemann v. Keyser

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1898.)

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1898-05-31

2 counsel of record

Relies on Schmidt v. Keyser

Opinion by PARRANGE · Decided 1898-05-31

¶1Ben. C. Tuni-son, for H. Vogemann.

¶2John C. Avery, for W. S. Keyser & Co.

¶3Before PARDEE and McCORMICK, Circuit Judges, and PARLANCE, District Judge.

¶4PARRANGE, District Judge.

¶5The issues in this case a,re the same as those in case No. 655, decided this day (Schmidt v. Keyser, 88 Fed. 799), and involving the construction of the “cesser clause,” identical in language with that in case No. 655. The decree appealed from is affirmed.