Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 88 F.2d 182 - Stark v. Texas Co.

Stark v. Texas Co.’s Empirical Analysis

88 F.2d 182 · 1937

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
February 2024
most recently cited

30 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Pershing Auto Rentals, Inc. v. Gaffney (1960), Wingerter v. Chester Quarry Co. (1998)

30 federal appellate ·

1201937194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Langnes v. Green · Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co. · Schoenamsgruber v. Hamburg American Line · Ex parte Green · Larsen v. Northland Transportation Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * ii has always been the practice in courts of admiralty, in certain cases, to first determine the liabilities of the parties to the suit and then refer the case to a commissioner to take evidence and fix -the measure of damages. Prior to the amendment, no appeal would lie from the preliminary decree. It was to avoid delay and the expense of taking further evidence, that might prove to be useless, if the decree as to liability should be reversed, that the amendment was adopted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the rights and liabilities of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.