Badger v. Hoidale’s Empirical Analysis
88 F.2d 208 · 1937
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 1996 · most notably Yoder v. Nu-Enamel Corp. (1941), State v. Sanabria (1984)
18 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hawks v. Hamill · Converse v. Hamilton · Combes v. Getz · McCandless v. Furlaud · People Ex Rel. Killeen v. . Angle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“considered dictum of that court should not be ignored when a federal court is attempting to construe or ascertain the meaning of the local law, whether it be the state statute or the State Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.