Jacobson v. Hahn’s Empirical Analysis
88 F.2d 433 · 1937
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2001
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pennsylvania Co v. Chamberlain · Pollock v. . Pollock · Arnall Mills v. Smallwood · Carlisle v. . Norris · Winn v. Consolidated Coach Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. The evidence showed that each of the three persons who contributed money to purchase the bonds received assurances that their money would be returned to them. In particular, one of the contributing individuals, Schneck, was given a receipt indicating the money was received for the purpose of securing bail for Flegenheimer, and upon discharge of the bail the money would be returned to Schneck. Id. In view of this evidence, the Second Circuit reversed the district court, concluding that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The question presented was whether the Liberty bonds so deposited were the property of Flegenheimer and so subject to distraint by the collector for unpaid income taxes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[p]laintiff rightfully can recover because of absence of proof of ownership in Flegenheimer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.