Barton Mfg. Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.’s Empirical Analysis
88 F.2d 708 · 1937
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1988
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celanese Corp. of America v. Vanity Fair Silk Mills · Bookman v. Oakland Chemical Co. · Proctor & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co. · American Cyanamid Co. v. Synthetic Nitrogen Products Corp. · Langfield v. Solvit-All Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no such thing as a correct pronounciation for a trade-mark. It is pronounced in different ways by different people.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.